↓ Skip to main content

Phytochemistry, Traditional Use and Pharmacological Activity of Picrasma quassioides: A Critical Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrients, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phytochemistry, Traditional Use and Pharmacological Activity of Picrasma quassioides: A Critical Reviews
Published in
Nutrients, August 2020
DOI 10.3390/nu12092584
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Daniel Hakim Mohd Jamil, Muhammad Taher, Deny Susanti, Atiar Rahman, Zainul Amiruddin Zakaria

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 15 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 15 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#18,741,816
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#15,019
of 18,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,648
of 399,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#618
of 734 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 734 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.