↓ Skip to main content

Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000012.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D, Ellen D Hodnett, Soo Downe, Denis Walsh

Abstract

Alternative institutional settings have been established for the care of pregnant women who prefer little or no medical intervention. The settings may offer care throughout pregnancy and birth, or only during labour; they may be part of hospitals or freestanding entities. Specially designed labour rooms include bedroom-like rooms, ambient rooms, and Snoezelen rooms.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
South Africa 3 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 182 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 21%
Student > Master 34 17%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 50 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 21%
Social Sciences 26 13%
Unspecified 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 24 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2016.
All research outputs
#414,234
of 8,612,116 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,701
of 8,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,275
of 99,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,612,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.