You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000012.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ellen D Hodnett, Soo Downe, Denis Walsh |
Abstract |
Alternative institutional settings have been established for the care of pregnant women who prefer little or no medical intervention. The settings may offer care throughout pregnancy and birth, or only during labour; they may be part of hospitals or freestanding entities. Specially designed labour rooms include bedroom-like rooms, ambient rooms, and Snoezelen rooms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 13% |
Australia | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
Scientists | 4 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 482 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 81 | 16% |
Student > Master | 69 | 14% |
Researcher | 47 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 8% |
Lecturer | 34 | 7% |
Other | 105 | 21% |
Unknown | 117 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 138 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 37 | 8% |
Psychology | 18 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 1% |
Other | 44 | 9% |
Unknown | 131 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,028,378
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,043
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,621
of 186,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.