↓ Skip to main content

島田裕巳著『葬式は、要らない』の葬儀費用に関するデータ分析について

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 633)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
81 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
島田裕巳著『葬式は、要らない』の葬儀費用に関するデータ分析について
Published in
Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu), January 2015
DOI 10.4259/ibk.64.1_152
Authors

愛宕 邦康

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#672,145
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)
#2
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,299
of 361,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.