You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005652.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jutta M Stoffers-Winterling, Birgit A Völlm, Gerta Rücker, Antje Timmer, Nick Huband, Klaus Lieb |
| Abstract |
Psychotherapy is regarded as the first-line treatment for people with borderline personality disorder. In recent years, several disorder-specific interventions have been developed. This is an update of a review published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in 2006. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| Spain | 5 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 23% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 927 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 910 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 148 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 132 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 12% |
| Researcher | 86 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 78 | 8% |
| Other | 137 | 15% |
| Unknown | 236 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 337 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 43 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 2% |
| Other | 61 | 7% |
| Unknown | 251 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#411,118
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#715
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,996
of 188,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.