You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Growth in VLBW infants fed predominantly fortified maternal and donor human milk diets: a retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tarah T Colaizy, Susan Carlson, Audrey F Saftlas, Frank H Morriss |
| Abstract |
To determine the effect of human milk, maternal and donor, on in-hospital growth of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing in-hospital growth in VLBW infants by proportion of human milk diet, including subgroup analysis by maternal or donor milk type. Primary outcome was change in weight z-score from birth to hospital discharge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 24% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,363,753
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#137
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,030
of 170,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.