| Title |
Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2026116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel F Gudbjartsson, Gudmundur L Norddahl, Pall Melsted, Kristbjorg Gunnarsdottir, Hilma Holm, Elias Eythorsson, Asgeir O Arnthorsson, Dadi Helgason, Kristbjorg Bjarnadottir, Ragnar F Ingvarsson, Brynja Thorsteinsdottir, Steinunn Kristjansdottir, Kolbrun Birgisdottir, Anna M Kristinsdottir, Martin I Sigurdsson, Gudny A Arnadottir, Erna V Ivarsdottir, Margret Andresdottir, Frosti Jonsson, Arna B Agustsdottir, Jonas Berglund, Berglind Eiriksdottir, Run Fridriksdottir, Elisabet E Gardarsdottir, Magnus Gottfredsson, Olafia S Gretarsdottir, Steinunn Gudmundsdottir, Kjartan R Gudmundsson, Thora R Gunnarsdottir, Arnaldur Gylfason, Agnar Helgason, Brynjar O Jensson, Aslaug Jonasdottir, Hakon Jonsson, Thordur Kristjansson, Karl G Kristinsson, Droplaug N Magnusdottir, Olafur T Magnusson, Lovisa B Olafsdottir, Solvi Rognvaldsson, Louise le Roux, Gudrun Sigmundsdottir, Asgeir Sigurdsson, Gardar Sveinbjornsson, Kristin E Sveinsdottir, Maney Sveinsdottir, Emil A Thorarensen, Bjarni Thorbjornsson, Marianna Thordardottir, Jona Saemundsdottir, S Hjortur Kristjansson, Kamilla S Josefsdottir, Gisli Masson, Gudmundur Georgsson, Mar Kristjansson, Alma Moller, Runolfur Palsson, Thorolfur Gudnason, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Ingileif Jonsdottir, Patrick Sulem, Kari Stefansson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,168 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 331 | 10% |
| Germany | 175 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 160 | 5% |
| Spain | 140 | 4% |
| Argentina | 59 | 2% |
| Canada | 52 | 2% |
| France | 45 | 1% |
| Colombia | 36 | 1% |
| Japan | 33 | 1% |
| Other | 539 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1598 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2645 | 83% |
| Scientists | 290 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 171 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 61 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 973 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 973 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 150 | 15% |
| Other | 103 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 94 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 8% |
| Other | 195 | 20% |
| Unknown | 273 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 296 | 30% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 90 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 83 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 2% |
| Other | 119 | 12% |
| Unknown | 320 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3877. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,327
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#108
of 32,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79
of 426,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#8
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.