↓ Skip to main content

Suprachiasmatic VIP neurons are required for normal circadian rhythmicity and comprised of molecularly distinct subpopulations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suprachiasmatic VIP neurons are required for normal circadian rhythmicity and comprised of molecularly distinct subpopulations
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-17197-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

William D. Todd, Anne Venner, Christelle Anaclet, Rebecca Y. Broadhurst, Roberto De Luca, Sathyajit S. Bandaru, Lindsay Issokson, Lauren M. Hablitz, Olga Cravetchi, Elda Arrigoni, John N. Campbell, Charles N. Allen, David P. Olson, Patrick M. Fuller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#9,584,907
of 17,383,690 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#27,096
of 34,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,952
of 306,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,383,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them