↓ Skip to main content

The social determinants of health and health service access: an in depth study in four poor communities in Phnom Penh Cambodia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The social determinants of health and health service access: an in depth study in four poor communities in Phnom Penh Cambodia
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-11-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sann Chan Soeung, John Grundy, Hean Sokhom, Diana Chang Blanc, Rasoka Thor

Abstract

Increasing urbanization and population density, and persisting inequities in health outcomes across socioeconomic groupings have raised concerns internationally regarding the health of the urban poor. These concerns are also evident in Cambodia, which prompted the design of a study to identify and describe the main barriers to access to health services by the poor in the capital city, Phnom Penh. SOURCES AND METHODS: Main sources of data were through a household survey, followed by in-depth qualitative interviews with mothers, local authorities and health centre workers in four very poor communities in Phnom Penh.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cambodia 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 23%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 18%
Social Sciences 24 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,156,101
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#586
of 1,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,230
of 169,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them