You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring pathways into and out of amphetamine type stimulant use at critical turning points: a qualitative interview study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Sociology Review, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/14461242.2020.1811747 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle Addison, Eileen Kaner, Liam Spencer, William McGovern, Ruth McGovern, Eilish Gilvarry, Amy O’Donnell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 46% |
| Australia | 5 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 54% |
| Scientists | 15 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 17% |
| Psychology | 5 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,553,527
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Health Sociology Review
#27
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,089
of 426,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Sociology Review
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.