↓ Skip to main content

Safety and immunogenicity of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine in two formulations: two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies from Russia

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 42,994)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
887 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1437 Mendeley
Title
Safety and immunogenicity of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine in two formulations: two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies from Russia
Published in
The Lancet, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31866-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denis Y Logunov, Inna V Dolzhikova, Olga V Zubkova, Amir I Tukhvatullin, Dmitry V Shcheblyakov, Alina S Dzharullaeva, Daria M Grousova, Alina S Erokhova, Anna V Kovyrshina, Andrei G Botikov, Fatima M Izhaeva, Olga Popova, Tatiana A Ozharovskaya, Ilias B Esmagambetov, Irina A Favorskaya, Denis I Zrelkin, Daria V Voronina, Dmitry N Shcherbinin, Alexander S Semikhin, Yana V Simakova, Elizaveta A Tokarskaya, Nadezhda L Lubenets, Daria A Egorova, Maksim M Shmarov, Natalia A Nikitenko, Lola F Morozova, Elena A Smolyarchuk, Evgeny V Kryukov, Vladimir F Babira, Sergei V Borisevich, Boris S Naroditsky, Alexander L Gintsburg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11,068 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1437 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 247 17%
Researcher 175 12%
Student > Master 120 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 8%
Other 78 5%
Other 237 16%
Unknown 469 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 342 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 166 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 80 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 50 3%
Other 223 16%
Unknown 516 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10282. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#179
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#20
of 42,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11
of 426,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.