| Title |
A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m3379 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François Lamontagne, Arnav Agarwal, Bram Rochwerg, Reed AC Siemieniuk, Thomas Agoritsas, Lisa Askie, Lyubov Lytvyn, Yee-Sin Leo, Helen Macdonald, Linan Zeng, Wagdy Amin, André Ricardo Araujo da Silva, Diptesh Aryal, Fabian A Jaimes Barragan, Frederique J Bausch, Erlina Burhan, Carolyn S Calfee, Maurizio Cecconi, Binila Chacko, Duncan Chanda, Vu Quoc Dat, An De Sutter, Bin Du, Stephen Freedman, Heike Geduld, Patrick Gee, Matthias Gotte, Nerina Harley, Madiha Hashmi, Beverley Hunt, Fyezah Jehan, Sushil K Kabra, Seema Kanda, Yae-Jean Kim, Niranjan Kissoon, Sanjeev Krishna, Krutika Kuppalli, Arthur Kwizera, Marta Lado Castro-Rial, Thiago Lisboa, Rakesh Lodha, Imelda Mahaka, Hela Manai, Marc Mendelson, Giovanni Battista Migliori, Greta Mino, Emmanuel Nsutebu, Jacobus Preller, Natalia Pshenichnaya, Nida Qadir, Pryanka Relan, Saniya Sabzwari, Rohit Sarin, Manu Shankar-Hari, Michael Sharland, Yinzhong Shen, Shalini S Ranganathan, Joao P Souza, Miriam Stegemann, Ronald Swanstrom, Sebastian Ugarte, Tim Uyeki, Sridhar Venkatapuram, Dubula Vuyiseka, Ananda Wijewickrama, Lien Tran, Dena Zeraatkar, Jessica J Bartoszko, Long Ge, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Andrew Owen, Gordon Guyatt, Janet Diaz, Leticia Kawano-Dourado, Michael Jacobs, Per Olav Vandvik |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7,623 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 779 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 357 | 5% |
| Spain | 304 | 4% |
| Italy | 255 | 3% |
| Mexico | 242 | 3% |
| Canada | 168 | 2% |
| India | 166 | 2% |
| Brazil | 165 | 2% |
| France | 153 | 2% |
| Other | 1428 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3606 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6099 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 775 | 10% |
| Scientists | 603 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 134 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 882 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 882 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 94 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 9% |
| Other | 72 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 50 | 6% |
| Other | 154 | 17% |
| Unknown | 344 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 282 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 54 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 94 | 11% |
| Unknown | 381 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7991. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#312
of 24,503,201 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#10
of 63,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25
of 404,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#3
of 751 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 751 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.