@DrSarteschi It’s a softer version of what’s mentioned in this article. It’s about individual rights to medical freedom beyond the “medical complex that is attached to secularism and the deep state.” Using essential oils, homeopathy, chiropractors, prayers
@dockaurG imho.. 'Sovereignty' more accurate definition: citizens ≠ cattle.. ruler vs. ruled. The academic gymnastics these last few years to manipulate our sacred social contract has laid bare a desperate grasp for power over the consent of autonomous ind
What's this modern constitutional democratic states all about, when did it ever change ? https://t.co/ygbTLmtbSU
@ItsBouquet Only one shall reign supreme: "Such an individualized response to the pandemic, which places the individual in the position of the (collective) sovereign, conflates individual autonomy with collective self-rule." https://t.co/xCZhoIReCy
@ran_the_numbers @davetroy Fair question. It's the anti-democratic sentiment that is particularly problematic. It's a tough contraction to resolve; I'm not sure you can exist as a sovereign individual without the protections afforded a form of government
RT @bialasiewicz: as @c_eckes and I argue, today's protest movements ably meld neoliberal appeals to ‘individual responsibility’ with a mys…
RT @bialasiewicz: as @c_eckes and I argue, today's protest movements ably meld neoliberal appeals to ‘individual responsibility’ with a mys…
as @c_eckes and I argue, today's protest movements ably meld neoliberal appeals to ‘individual responsibility’ with a mystified and de-politicized notion of ‘sovereignty’ ‘Individual sovereignty’ in pandemic times – A contradiction in terms? https://t.co/
This
RT @bialasiewicz: 3/ and with @c_eckes a piece taking to task the notion of ‘individual sovereignty’ which has been invoked by these moveme…
3/ and with @c_eckes a piece taking to task the notion of ‘individual sovereignty’ which has been invoked by these movements to contest the pandemic powers of the state https://t.co/QTNHeDSkvZ
Well written but utterly unconvincing. Ignores the concept of natural rights. https://t.co/QkH8logE9E
@PremierScottMoe “. . . while governments may be tempted to ensure compliance with COVID-19 measures through appeals to ‘individual responsibility’, this framing is inherently perilous.” https://t.co/gwV4afpHfV
@SKGov @SaskHealth “... while governments may be tempted to ensure compliance with COVID-19 measures through appeals to ‘individual responsibility’, this framing is inherently perilous.” https://t.co/gwV4afpHfV
@DerekH3565 @BohunkHusker @SilentFighter18 @MayorLeirion ‘Individual sovereignty’ in pandemic times – A contradiction in terms? @bialasiewicz and Christina Eckes https://t.co/kW3sf1eeii CC: @kohenari https://t.co/5FBu845VDi
"an individualized response to the pandemic ... obscures the rights of the diverse collective to protection from individual behaviours that can take an excessive toll on the health care system (a common good) +
RT @bialasiewicz: new piece with @c_eckes from our research project at @aces_for why #antimaskers appeals to 'individual sovereignty' make…
new piece with @c_eckes from our research project at @aces_for why #antimaskers appeals to 'individual sovereignty' make no legal sense in a democracy ‘Individual sovereignty’ in pandemic times – A contradiction in terms? https://t.co/7HkYViRRMp