↓ Skip to main content

Complementary and alternative therapies for post‐caesarean pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complementary and alternative therapies for post‐caesarean pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011216.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra A Zimpel, Maria Regina Torloni, Gustavo Jm Porfírio, Ronald Lg Flumignan, Edina Mk da Silva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 363 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Student > Master 29 8%
Other 20 6%
Researcher 19 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 196 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 54 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 12%
Psychology 15 4%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 206 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,425,560
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,991
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,821
of 426,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.