You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to interpret lactate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Education & Practice Edition, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319601 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dilshad Marikar, Pratusha Babu, Miriam Fine-Goulden |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 39% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 38% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 57% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#819,430
of 24,489,824 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Education & Practice Edition
#26
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,656
of 404,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Education & Practice Edition
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.