↓ Skip to main content

Trophic diversity in the evolution and community assembly of loricariid catfishes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trophic diversity in the evolution and community assembly of loricariid catfishes
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan K Lujan, Kirk O Winemiller, Jonathan W Armbruster

Abstract

The Neotropical catfish family Loricariidae contains over 830 species that display extraordinary variation in jaw morphologies but nonetheless reveal little interspecific variation from a generalized diet of detritus and algae. To investigate this paradox, we collected δ13C and δ15N stable isotope signatures from 649 specimens representing 32 loricariid genera and 82 species from 19 local assemblages distributed across South America. We calculated vectors representing the distance and direction of each specimen relative to the δ15N/δ13C centroid for its local assemblage, and then examined the evolutionary diversification of loricariids across assemblage isotope niche space by regressing the mean vector for each genus in each assemblage onto a phylogeny reconstructed from osteological characters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United States 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 169 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 58%
Environmental Science 23 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,456,379
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#339
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,296
of 178,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#6
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.