↓ Skip to main content

わが国近海に産する軟体動物門に共生するカイアシ亜綱(甲殻亜門)の目録

Overview of attention for article published in Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 113)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
わが国近海に産する軟体動物門に共生するカイアシ亜綱(甲殻亜門)の目録
Published in
Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, August 2020
DOI 10.19004/taxa.49.0_23
Authors

上野 大輔

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,191,899
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#48
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,954
of 426,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.