↓ Skip to main content

Chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management of COVID-19: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline (updated version)

Overview of attention for article published in Military Medical Research, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 443)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
427 Mendeley
Title
Chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management of COVID-19: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline (updated version)
Published in
Military Medical Research, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40779-020-00270-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying-Hui Jin, Qing-Yuan Zhan, Zhi-Yong Peng, Xue-Qun Ren, Xun-Tao Yin, Lin Cai, Yu-Feng Yuan, Ji-Rong Yue, Xiao-Chun Zhang, Qi-Wen Yang, Jianguang Ji, Jian Xia, Yi-Rong Li, Fu-Xiang Zhou, Ya-Dong Gao, Zhui Yu, Feng Xu, Ming-Li Tu, Li-Ming Tan, Min Yang, Fang Chen, Xiao-Ju Zhang, Mei Zeng, Yu Zhu, Xin-Can Liu, Jian Yang, Dong-Chi Zhao, Yu-Feng Ding, Ning Hou, Fu-Bing Wang, Hao Chen, Yong-Gang Zhang, Wei Li, Wen Chen, Yue-Xian Shi, Xiu-Zhi Yang, Xue-Jun Wang, Yan-Jun Zhong, Ming-Juan Zhao, Bing-Hui Li, Lin-Lu Ma, Hao Zi, Na Wang, Yun-Yun Wang, Shao-Fu Yu, Lu-Yao Li, Qiao Huang, Hong Weng, Xiang-Ying Ren, Li-Sha Luo, Man-Ru Fan, Di Huang, Hong-Yang Xue, Lin-Xin Yu, Jin-Ping Gao, Tong Deng, Xian-Tao Zeng, Hong-Jun Li, Zhen-Shun Cheng, Xiaomei Yao, Xing-Huan Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 427 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 67 16%
Student > Master 47 11%
Researcher 28 7%
Other 18 4%
Student > Postgraduate 18 4%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 180 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 193 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,982,392
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Military Medical Research
#35
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,399
of 424,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Military Medical Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.