You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Best practices in intercultural health: five case studies in Latin America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-3-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javier Mignone, Judith Bartlett, John O'Neil, Treena Orchard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,027,092
of 23,506,136 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#52
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,224
of 71,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,136 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them