↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of clinical congenital and neonatal malaria in endemic settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology of clinical congenital and neonatal malaria in endemic settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03373-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celestin Danwang, Jean Joel Bigna, Rolf Nyah Tuku Nzalie, Annie Robert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Unspecified 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Design 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,625,509
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,545
of 5,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,374
of 398,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#101
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.