↓ Skip to main content

HOW THE VISUAL IS SPATIAL: CONTEMPORARY SPATIAL HISTORY, NEO‐MARXISM, AND THE GHOST OF BRAUDEL

Overview of attention for article published in History & Theory, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HOW THE VISUAL IS SPATIAL: CONTEMPORARY SPATIAL HISTORY, NEO‐MARXISM, AND THE GHOST OF BRAUDEL
Published in
History & Theory, September 2020
DOI 10.1111/hith.12162
Authors

WILLIAM RANKIN

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 4 40%
Social Sciences 4 40%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,900,658
of 19,741,505 outputs
Outputs from History & Theory
#58
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,406
of 314,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from History & Theory
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,741,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.