↓ Skip to main content

The importance of work conditions and health for voluntary job mobility: a two-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of work conditions and health for voluntary job mobility: a two-year follow-up
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathrine Reineholm, Maria Gustavsson, Mats Liljegren, Kerstin Ekberg

Abstract

Changing jobs is part of modern working life. Within occupational health, job mobility has mainly been studied in terms of employees' intentions to leave their jobs. In contrast to actual turnover, turnover intentions are not definite and only reflect the probability that an individual will change job. The aim of this study was to determine what work conditions predict voluntary job mobility and to examine if good health or burnout predicts voluntary job mobility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 29%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 18%
Psychology 6 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2012.
All research outputs
#13,366,719
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,467
of 14,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,382
of 169,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#188
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.