↓ Skip to main content

Somatic therapies for treatment-resistant depression: ECT, TMS, VNS, DBS

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Somatic therapies for treatment-resistant depression: ECT, TMS, VNS, DBS
Published in
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/2045-5380-2-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Cusin, Darin D Dougherty

Abstract

The field of non-pharmacological therapies for treatment resistant depression (TRD) is rapidly evolving and new somatic therapies are valuable options for patients who have failed numerous other treatments. A major challenge for clinicians (and patients alike) is how to integrate the results from published clinical trials in the clinical decision-making process.We reviewed the literature for articles reporting results for clinical trials in particular efficacy data, contraindications and side effects of somatic therapies including electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Each of these devices has an indication for patients with different level of treatment resistance, based on acuteness of illness, likelihood of response, costs and associated risks. ECT is widely available and its effects are relatively rapid in severe TRD, but its cognitive adverse effects may be cumbersome. TMS is safe and well tolerated, and it has been approved by FDA for adults who have failed to respond to one antidepressant, but its use in TRD is still controversial as it is not supported by rigorous double-blind randomized clinical trials. The options requiring surgical approach are VNS and DBS. VNS has been FDA-approved for TRD, however it is not indicated for management of acute illness. DBS for TRD is still an experimental area of investigation and double-blind clinical trials are underway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 22%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 42 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 20%
Psychology 21 12%
Neuroscience 20 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 11%
Engineering 11 7%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,384,123
of 25,195,876 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#10
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,764
of 177,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,195,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them