↓ Skip to main content

Flux variability scanning based on enforced objective flux for identifying gene amplification targets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flux variability scanning based on enforced objective flux for identifying gene amplification targets
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-6-106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jong Myoung Park, Hye Min Park, Won Jun Kim, Hyun Uk Kim, Tae Yong Kim, Sang Yup Lee

Abstract

In order to reduce time and efforts to develop microbial strains with better capability of producing desired bioproducts, genome-scale metabolic simulations have proven useful in identifying gene knockout and amplification targets. Constraints-based flux analysis has successfully been employed for such simulation, but is limited in its ability to properly describe the complex nature of biological systems. Gene knockout simulations are relatively straightforward to implement, simply by constraining the flux values of the target reaction to zero, but the identification of reliable gene amplification targets is rather difficult. Here, we report a new algorithm which incorporates physiological data into a model to improve the model's prediction capabilities and to capitalize on the relationships between genes and metabolic fluxes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 125 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 26%
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 17%
Engineering 19 14%
Chemical Engineering 7 5%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 29 22%