↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary ultrasound imaging in the hemodynamic evaluation in the early post-operative period of cardiac surgery.

Overview of attention for article published in Archivos de cardiología de México, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary ultrasound imaging in the hemodynamic evaluation in the early post-operative period of cardiac surgery.
Published in
Archivos de cardiología de México, September 2020
DOI 10.24875/acme.m20000121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis E Santos-Martínez, Miguel Á Hernández-Márquez, Jessica Garduño-López, Efrén Melano-Carranza, Gastón Mendoza-Copa, Gustavo Rojas-Velazco, Guillermo Fernández de la Reguera-Fernández Del Campo, Francisco M Baranda-Tovar, Rolando J Álvarez-Álvarez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#191
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#368,001
of 426,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.