↓ Skip to main content

‘Working to Live, Not Living to Work’: Low-Paid Multiple Employment and Work–Life Articulation

Overview of attention for article published in Work, Employment & Society, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Working to Live, Not Living to Work’: Low-Paid Multiple Employment and Work–Life Articulation
Published in
Work, Employment & Society, September 2020
DOI 10.1177/0950017020942645
Authors

Andrew Smith, Jo McBride

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#691,559
of 15,929,276 outputs
Outputs from Work, Employment & Society
#82
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,503
of 223,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Work, Employment & Society
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,929,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.