You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Prospective Study of Sudden Cardiac Death among Children and Young Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1510687 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard D Bagnall, Robert G Weintraub, Jodie Ingles, Johan Duflou, Laura Yeates, Lien Lam, Andrew M Davis, Tina Thompson, Vanessa Connell, Jennie Wallace, Charles Naylor, Jackie Crawford, Donald R Love, Lavinia Hallam, Jodi White, Christopher Lawrence, Matthew Lynch, Natalie Morgan, Paul James, Desirée du Sart, Rajesh Puranik, Neil Langlois, Jitendra Vohra, Ingrid Winship, John Atherton, Julie McGaughran, Jonathan R Skinner, Christopher Semsarian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 548 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 102 | 19% |
| Australia | 63 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 7% |
| Spain | 36 | 7% |
| Canada | 16 | 3% |
| Argentina | 7 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 68 | 12% |
| Unknown | 200 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 347 | 63% |
| Scientists | 101 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 74 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 24 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 618 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 604 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 90 | 15% |
| Other | 65 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 9% |
| Other | 146 | 24% |
| Unknown | 143 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 297 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 49 | 8% |
| Unknown | 166 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 622. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#36,973
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,351
of 32,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#702
of 370,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#14
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.