↓ Skip to main content

Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: a large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
752 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
951 Mendeley
Title
Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: a large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study
Published in
The Lancet, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31558-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre de Figueiredo, Clarissa Simas, Emilie Karafillakis, Pauline Paterson, Heidi J Larson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,554 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 951 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 951 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 136 14%
Researcher 109 11%
Student > Bachelor 100 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 7%
Other 37 4%
Other 164 17%
Unknown 339 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 15%
Social Sciences 93 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 74 8%
Psychology 40 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 3%
Other 188 20%
Unknown 381 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3458. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,663
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#106
of 42,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111
of 426,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#9
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.