Title |
Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: a large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31558-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexandre de Figueiredo, Clarissa Simas, Emilie Karafillakis, Pauline Paterson, Heidi J Larson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,554 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 200 | 13% |
United States | 104 | 7% |
France | 83 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 77 | 5% |
Canada | 21 | 1% |
Spain | 17 | 1% |
Argentina | 16 | 1% |
India | 16 | 1% |
Australia | 15 | <1% |
Other | 192 | 12% |
Unknown | 813 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1287 | 83% |
Scientists | 143 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 96 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 27 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 951 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 951 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 136 | 14% |
Researcher | 109 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 100 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 4% |
Other | 164 | 17% |
Unknown | 339 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 93 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 8% |
Psychology | 40 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 3% |
Other | 188 | 20% |
Unknown | 381 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3458. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,663
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#106
of 42,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111
of 426,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#9
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.