| Title |
Efficacy of dexamethasone treatment for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19: study protocol for a randomized controlled superiority trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-020-04643-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesús Villar, José M. Añón, Carlos Ferrando, Gerardo Aguilar, Tomás Muñoz, José Ferreres, Alfonso Ambrós, César Aldecoa, Fernando Suárez-Sipmann, Kevin E. Thorpe, Peter Jüni, Arthur S. Slutsky, Carlos Ferrando, Ricard Mellado-Artigas, Javier Fernández, María Hernández, Manuel Castellá, Pedro Castro, Joan Ramón Badia, Gerardo Aguilar, José A. Carbonell, Rafael Badenes, Carlos Tornero, José Ferreres, María L. Blasco, Nieves Carbonell, Ainhoa Serrano, Mar Juan, José I. Gómez-Herreras, Mario Lorenzo López, Alfonso Ambrós, Carmen Martín, Rafael del Campo, Jaume Puig-Bernabeu, Carolina Ferrer, José de Andrés, Tomás Muñoz, Pablo Serna-Grande, Gonzalo Tamayo, Alberto Martínez-Ruíz, Iñaki Bilbao-Villasante, Jesús Villar, Rosa L. Fernández, César Pérez Calvo, Ánxela Vidal, José M. Añón, Juan Carlos Figueira, María José Asensio, Emilio Maseda, Fernando Suárez-Sipmann, Fernando Ramasco, Marina Varela-Durán, Pilar Díaz-Parada, Josep Trenado-Álvarez, María M. Fernández, César Aldecoa, Jesús Rico-Feijoo, Lorena Fernández, Jesús Sánchez-Ballesteros, Pablo Blanco-Schweizer, Domingo Martínez, Juan A. Soler, Arthur S. Slutsky, Peter Jüni, Kevin E. Thorpe, Rekha Thomas, Kosma Wysocki, Pamela de Verno, Gurpreet Lakhanpal, Clara Juando-Prats |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 241 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 89 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 90 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,568,227
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#531
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,839
of 414,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them