↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing the use of video interpretation compared to in-person interpretation in hospitals: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing the use of video interpretation compared to in-person interpretation in hospitals: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05720-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eli Feiring, Stine Westdahl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 29 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 32 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,049,656
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,305
of 8,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,171
of 426,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#33
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.