↓ Skip to main content

Prescribing “Off-Label”: What Should a Physician Disclose?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 2,830)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
92 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
44 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prescribing “Off-Label”: What Should a Physician Disclose?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2016
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.6.ecas3-1606
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina Furey, Kirsten Wilkins

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Other 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 762. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#27,614
of 26,626,316 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#4
of 2,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#447
of 333,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.