| Title |
Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID‐19: a rapid review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013574.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Verena Mayr, Andreea Iulia Dobrescu, Andrea Chapman, Emma Persad, Irma Klerings, Gernot Wagner, Uwe Siebert, Dominic Ledinger, Casey Zachariah, Gerald Gartlehner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 966 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 249 | 26% |
| United States | 36 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 3% |
| Mexico | 26 | 3% |
| Australia | 20 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 17 | 2% |
| Chile | 13 | 1% |
| Colombia | 9 | <1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 112 | 12% |
| Unknown | 450 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 793 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 106 | 11% |
| Scientists | 53 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 436 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 11% |
| Researcher | 45 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 14% |
| Unknown | 180 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 10% |
| Psychology | 24 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 13% |
| Unknown | 195 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 772. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#25,697
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 13,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,039
of 429,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.