You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of mountain ultramarathon distance competition on biochemical variables, respiratory and lower-limb fatigue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0238846 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ignacio Martínez-Navarro, Juan Miguel Sanchez-Gómez, Inma Aparicio, Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada, Pedro Pérez-Soriano, Eladio Collado, Bárbara Hernando, Carlos Hernando |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 75% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2021.
All research outputs
#12,874,963
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,525
of 198,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,145
of 401,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,429
of 2,845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.