↓ Skip to main content

Effect of mountain ultramarathon distance competition on biochemical variables, respiratory and lower-limb fatigue

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of mountain ultramarathon distance competition on biochemical variables, respiratory and lower-limb fatigue
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0238846
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignacio Martínez-Navarro, Juan Miguel Sanchez-Gómez, Inma Aparicio, Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada, Pedro Pérez-Soriano, Eladio Collado, Bárbara Hernando, Carlos Hernando

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 37 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 21 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 42 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2021.
All research outputs
#12,874,963
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,525
of 198,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,145
of 401,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,429
of 2,845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.