↓ Skip to main content

On the dynamical aspects of local translation at the activated synapse

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the dynamical aspects of local translation at the activated synapse
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12859-020-03597-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara M. Khlebodarova, Vladislav V. Kogai, Vitaly A. Likhoshvai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#9,939,297
of 16,181,650 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,855
of 5,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,132
of 305,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#29
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,181,650 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.