↓ Skip to main content

When discussion between eyewitnesses helps memory

Overview of attention for article published in Legal & Criminological Psychology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 193)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
17 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
When discussion between eyewitnesses helps memory
Published in
Legal & Criminological Psychology, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/lcrp.12097
Authors

Vredeveldt, Annelies, Groen, Robin N., Ampt, Juliette E., Koppen, Peter J., Annelies Vredeveldt, Robin N. Groen, Juliette E. Ampt, Peter J. van Koppen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#107,825
of 6,889,784 outputs
Outputs from Legal & Criminological Psychology
#4
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,987
of 252,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Legal & Criminological Psychology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,889,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them