↓ Skip to main content

Surgeons and social media: The use of twitter hashtags at the Academic Surgical Congress 2015–2019: A cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Medicine and Surgery, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Surgeons and social media: The use of twitter hashtags at the Academic Surgical Congress 2015–2019: A cross sectional study
Published in
Annals of Medicine and Surgery, October 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen Santarone, Evander Meneses, Aaron Shepherd, Dessy Boneva, Mark Mckenney, Adel Elkbuli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#9,445,950
of 16,074,467 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Medicine and Surgery
#121
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,307
of 282,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Medicine and Surgery
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,074,467 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.