↓ Skip to main content

Rainfall triggers more deep-seated landslides than Cascadia earthquakes in the Oregon Coast Range, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
45 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rainfall triggers more deep-seated landslides than Cascadia earthquakes in the Oregon Coast Range, USA
Published in
Science Advances, September 2020
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aba6790
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. R. LaHusen, A. R. Duvall, A. M. Booth, A. Grant, B. A. Mishkin, D. R. Montgomery, W. Struble, J. J. Roering, J. Wartman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 39 46%
Engineering 6 7%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#472,308
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#3,381
of 12,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,826
of 416,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#146
of 540 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 540 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.