↓ Skip to main content

“First, Do No Harm”: Tread Carefully Where Oral History, Trauma, and Current Crises Intersect

Overview of attention for article published in Oral History Review, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 244)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
“First, Do No Harm”: Tread Carefully Where Oral History, Trauma, and Current Crises Intersect
Published in
Oral History Review, September 2020
DOI 10.1080/00940798.2020.1793679
Authors

Jennifer A. Cramer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Librarian 2 17%
Other 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Social Sciences 2 17%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#784,151
of 17,687,978 outputs
Outputs from Oral History Review
#6
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,615
of 315,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral History Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,687,978 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them