You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute effects of naturalistic THC vs. CBD use on recognition memory: a preliminary study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cannabis Research, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42238-020-00034-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Curran, Hélène Devillez, Sophie L. YorkWilliams, L. Cinnamon Bidwell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Portugal | 2 | 13% |
| Iceland | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,000,430
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cannabis Research
#63
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,238
of 414,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cannabis Research
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.