↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0239181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Halle Johnson, Emel Yorganci, Catherine J. Evans, Stephen Barclay, Fliss E. M. Murtagh, Deokhee Yi, Wei Gao, Elizabeth L. Sampson, Joanne Droney, Morag Farquhar, Jonathan Koffman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 25%
Student > Master 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Social Sciences 3 15%
Design 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#735,914
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,217
of 165,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,337
of 315,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#62
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.