You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why Do Policymakers Support Administrative Burdens? The Roles of Deservingness, Political Ideology, and Personal Experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muaa033 |
| Authors |
Martin Baekgaard, Donald P Moynihan, Mette Kjærgaard Thomsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 32% |
| Denmark | 4 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 84% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 34 | 45% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#689,339
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#24
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,770
of 432,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.