↓ Skip to main content

Rapid social perception is flexible: approach and avoidance motivational states shape P100 responses to other-race faces

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Rapid social perception is flexible: approach and avoidance motivational states shape P100 responses to other-race faces
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00140
Pubmed ID
Authors

William A. Cunningham, Jay J. Van Bavel, Nathan L. Arbuckle, Dominic J. Packer, Ashley S. Waggoner

Abstract

Research on person categorization suggests that people automatically and inflexibly categorize others according to group memberships, such as race. Consistent with this view, research using electroencephalography (EEG) has found that White participants tend to show an early difference in processing Black versus White faces. Yet, new research has shown that these ostensibly automatic biases may not be as inevitable as once thought and that motivational influences may be able to eliminate these biases. It is unclear, however, whether motivational influences shape the initial biases or whether these biases can only be modulated by later, controlled processes. Using EEG to examine the time course of biased processing, we manipulated approach and avoidance motivational states by having participants pull or push a joystick, respectively, while viewing White or Black faces. Consistent with previous work on own-race bias, we observed a greater P100 response to White than Black faces; however, this racial bias was attenuated in the approach condition. These data suggest that rapid social perception may be flexible and can be modulated by motivational states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Italy 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 104 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 59%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,066,139
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,504
of 7,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,766
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#122
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.