↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Oncologist Implicit Racial Bias in Racially Discordant Oncology Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
33 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effects of Oncologist Implicit Racial Bias in Racially Discordant Oncology Interactions
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2016
DOI 10.1200/jco.2015.66.3658
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louis A Penner, John F Dovidio, Richard Gonzalez, Terrance L Albrecht, Robert Chapman, Tanina Foster, Felicity W K Harper, Nao Hagiwara, Lauren M Hamel, Anthony F Shields, Shirish Gadgeel, Michael S Simon, Jennifer J Griggs, Susan Eggly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 52 23%
Unknown 55 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 23%
Psychology 29 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Social Sciences 22 10%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 72 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 338. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#99,618
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#190
of 22,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,057
of 371,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#5
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.