↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Gene amplification-associated overexpression of the RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 enhances human lung tumorigenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Oncogene, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Erratum: Gene amplification-associated overexpression of the RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 enhances human lung tumorigenesis
Published in
Oncogene, June 2016
DOI 10.1038/onc.2016.27
Pubmed ID
Authors

C Anadón, S Guil, L Simó-Riudalbas, C Moutinho, F Setien, A Martínez-Cardús, S Moran, A Villanueva, M Calaf, A Vidal, P A Lazo, I Zondervan, S Savola, T Kohno, J Yokota, L Ribas de Pouplana, M Esteller

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,108,901
of 7,953,275 outputs
Outputs from Oncogene
#471
of 4,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,954
of 261,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncogene
#44
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,953,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.