You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts 5 yr survival after major surgery †
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1093/bja/aes263 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Colson, J Baglin, S Bolsin, M.P.W. Grocott |
| Abstract |
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used to assess perioperative risk in surgical patients. While previous studies have looked at short-term outcomes, this paper explores the ability of CPET to predict 5 yr survival after major surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 27% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 66% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,047,954
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#2,876
of 6,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,560
of 186,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#18
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.