↓ Skip to main content

Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol.

Overview of attention for article published in JBI Evidence Synthesis, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol.
Published in
JBI Evidence Synthesis, September 2020
DOI 10.11124/jbies-20-00078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea C Tricco, Chantelle C Lachance, Patricia Rios, Nazia Darvesh, Jesmin Antony, Amruta Radhakrishnan, Sonia S Anand, Nancy Baxter, Karen E A Burns, Doug Coyle, Janet A Curran, Kirsten Fiest, Ian D Graham, Gillian Hawker, France Légaré, Jennifer Watt, Holly O Witteman, Jocalyn P Clark, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Sofia B Ahmed, Karen Lawford, Alice Aiken, Holly J Falk-Krzesinski, Etienne V Langlois, Chris McCabe, Sasha Shepperd, Becky Skidmore, Reena Pattani, Natalie Leon, Jamie Lundine, Lionel Adisso, Wafa El-Adhami, Sharon E Straus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 12%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 34 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 10%
Unspecified 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 35 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,411,839
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JBI Evidence Synthesis
#230
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,504
of 425,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JBI Evidence Synthesis
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.