↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in JBI Evidence Synthesis, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
Published in
JBI Evidence Synthesis, October 2020
DOI 10.11124/jbies-20-00078
Pubmed ID
32925395
Authors

Andrea C. Tricco, Chantelle C. Lachance, Patricia Rios, Nazia Darvesh, Jesmin Antony, Amruta Radhakrishnan, Sonia S. Anand, Nancy Baxter, Karen E. A. Burns, Doug Coyle, Janet A. Curran, Kirsten Fiest, Ian D. Graham, Gillian Hawker, France Légaré, Jennifer Watt, Holly O. Witteman, Jocalyn P. Clark, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Sofia B. Ahmed, Karen Lawford, Alice Aiken, Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Etienne V. Langlois, Chris McCabe, Sasha Shepperd, Becky Skidmore, Reena Pattani, Natalie Leon, Jamie Lundine, Lionel Adisso, Wafa El-Adhami, Sharon E. Straus

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 11%
Unspecified 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Librarian 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 27 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 10%
Unspecified 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 28 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,878,308
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from JBI Evidence Synthesis
#80
of 478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,901
of 412,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JBI Evidence Synthesis
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.