↓ Skip to main content

CDM eta POP : an individual‐based, eco‐evolutionary model for spatially explicit simulation of landscape demogenetics

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CDM eta POP : an individual‐based, eco‐evolutionary model for spatially explicit simulation of landscape demogenetics
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2016
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12608
Authors

Erin L. Landguth, Andrew Bearlin, Casey C. Day, Jason Dunham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 25%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 52%
Environmental Science 30 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Computer Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 15 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,648,637
of 16,107,330 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#942
of 1,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,127
of 264,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#35
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,107,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.