↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of speech and language therapy techniques for speech problems in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of speech and language therapy techniques for speech problems in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002814.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare P Herd, Claire L Tomlinson, Katherine HO Deane, Marian C Brady, Christina H Smith, Catherine M Sackley, Carl E Clarke

Abstract

Patients with Parkinson's disease commonly suffer from speech and voice difficulties such as impaired articulation and reduced loudness. Speech and language therapy (SLT) aims to improve the intelligibility of speech with behavioural treatment techniques or instrumental aids.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 215 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 23%
Student > Bachelor 45 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Researcher 17 8%
Other 16 7%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 25%
Linguistics 16 7%
Psychology 13 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 25 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,414,897
of 15,038,563 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,113
of 11,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,522
of 131,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,038,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.