You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enhancing regeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Genetics, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41576-020-00290-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katharine H. Wrighton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 38% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
Scientists | 5 | 31% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 29% |
Professor | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 41% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,704,864
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#1,299
of 2,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,538
of 408,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.