@MIAM_Bonn @nomainstream69 Wieso glaubte man? Es wurde in den Zulassungsstudien nicht untersucht und vom immunolgischen Ablauf war es auch nicht möglich. https://t.co/Y4ev4gfEFU
@OhmGohm21 The vaccines were not unnecessarily rushed + the needed studies were done. Try a different talking point. I've been dealing with vaccine denialism for over a decade; almost anything you say will be something I've heard many times before. http
@RSSol64860963 Lea y aprenda. https://t.co/JBTE6pp5ZD
RT @Friedemann1: However, as far as I know the process was simply accelerated by doing an overlap of the clinical studies (see https://t.co…
RT @DrJanKirsch: @mkultramaga1 @The_Ouroboros__ @Catoclysmos @yesnicksearcy @pfizer The mRNA vaccines were in development for decades. The…
@mkultramaga1 @The_Ouroboros__ @Catoclysmos @yesnicksearcy @pfizer The mRNA vaccines were in development for decades. The technology ramped up in 2003 when SARS-1 exploded, but was put on the back burner when it died down. Same thing when MERS appeared in
RT @SchoofsLiliane: @BoetSchouwink Dit was daarvoor al basiskennis immunologie. Janeway's Immunobiology. Chapter 12: The mucosal immune sys…
RT @SchoofsLiliane: @BoetSchouwink Dit was daarvoor al basiskennis immunologie. Janeway's Immunobiology. Chapter 12: The mucosal immune sys…
@BoetSchouwink Dit was daarvoor al basiskennis immunologie. Janeway's Immunobiology. Chapter 12: The mucosal immune system. https://t.co/Ril33Uw3bi https://t.co/qmVM89v1LM https://t.co/8NQhDiuoBJ
September 23, 2020 Vaccines that are administered intramuscularly or intradermally induce mainly IgG, and no secretory IgA. Therefore, the vaxxes won't keep you from getting or spreading the virus. Vax can't stop transmission. https://t.co/pQ3LDY7JRC
@Vetor07911041 @SaindodaBolha https://t.co/wguihKmq97 aguardando sua postagem amigo, cade??
@Vetor07911041 @SaindodaBolha não há?? voce nem viu que era fake cara, mas ta ai: https://t.co/wguihKmq97 olha ai, testes antes dos humanos, óbvio, não se lança sem testar antes cara.
@roadjull @Friedemann1 Have you finally learned how vaccine development + testing works yet, non-expert vaccine denialist? https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/pJZz8g78F3 https://t.co/9IA0rxAD2e
@roadjull @Friedemann1 You should pretend to be an MD PhD when you struggle with basic concepts like 'phase 1 clinical trials'. Go do some reading, lab leak conspiracist + non-expert vaccine denialist: https://t.co/pJZz8g78F3 https://t.co/RLjwz3gs0B
RT @Friedemann1: However, as far as I know the process was simply accelerated by doing an overlap of the clinical studies (see https://t.co…
@roadjull @Friedemann1 Google what 'phase 1 clinical trial' means. https://t.co/6IFsqUkpYJ
RT @Friedemann1: However, as far as I know the process was simply accelerated by doing an overlap of the clinical studies (see https://t.co…
RT @Friedemann1: However, as far as I know the process was simply accelerated by doing an overlap of the clinical studies (see https://t.co…
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development | Nature https://t.co/ULMcucytYK
RT @Friedemann1: However, as far as I know the process was simply accelerated by doing an overlap of the clinical studies (see https://t.co…
RT @Friedemann1: However, as far as I know the process was simply accelerated by doing an overlap of the clinical studies (see https://t.co…
However, as far as I know the process was simply accelerated by doing an overlap of the clinical studies (see https://t.co/MLiuO8ReS3) 5/ https://t.co/xjx581Vk19
RT @florian_krammer: 1) SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines - I promised a Tweetorial and here we go. This is going to be long and nerdy. But I'll make sur…
@kevinnbass This was known early on before the vaccines were released, for example. "The upper respiratory tract is thought to be mainly protected by secretory IgA, whereas the lower respiratory tract is thought to be mainly protected by IgG. Vaccines that
@0rf This was known early on before the vaccines were released, for example. "The upper respiratory tract is thought to be mainly protected by secretory IgA, whereas the lower respiratory tract is thought to be mainly protected by IgG. Vaccines that are...
39-42/ This paper suggested that mRNA vaccines present the entire spike protein to our immune system. If that's the case, if we have received an mRNA vaccine, we should be able to neutralize more than just specific epitopes on the RBD. No? https://t.co/29
@zato79 @BrennpunktUA Den Unterschied zwischen systemischer und sterile Immunität nach 3 1/2 Jahren Covid immer noch nicht verstanden? https://t.co/gjLuUd1oZV https://t.co/lQKFz5wMv7
@GauteNilsen @Richard03900327 @GVDBossche This was known early on before the vaccines were released, for example. "The upper respiratory tract is thought to be mainly protected by secretory IgA, whereas the lower respiratory tract is thought to be mainly p
@margan_ron @avavidan @avishai_matia המחקרים על פניצילין נעשו לאור התצפיות בהן הוא הדגים יכולת אנטי בקטריאלית. העלו השערה ובדקו אותה. במקרה של חיסון פייזר,חוסר היכולת במניעת הדבקה היה צפוי. יש להניח שזו גם הסיבה שיכולת זו לא נבדקה בניסויים הקליניים-הם ידעו
@MadisonCarly26 This will help you understand how the covid vaccines were developed. https://t.co/R3JwjobRnL
@LOdinaev @Yair__Lahav @DanielGinat 1.רמת נוגדנים היא תוצא מעבדתי לא רלוונטי, ובכל מקרה גם אם נצמדים אליה-חיסונים בזריקה לא מצטיינים ביצירת הנוגדנים הרלוונטיים למניעת הדבקה.היה ידוע גם ב 2020 https://t.co/zBsXStBqWA 2.יעילות במניעת הדבקה לא נבדקה מלכתחילה
@maxotte_says Unterschied zwischen "systemic immune response" und "mucosal immune response" nicht verstanden? Aktuelle Impfstoffe führen zu keiner "sterilizing immunity" schützen aber vor Infektion der Lunge ⬇️ https://t.co/gjLuUd1oZV https://t.co/Trsj9JD
I found the Nature (top science journal) article from September 2020* (vaccines still developing) which made me decide not to get the Covid 19 vax as a young person unless things seriously changed. It's packed full of info. #vaccines #covid https://t.c
@dorgilon1 @LeibowitzRaya וזה בנוסף על העובדה (השולית ) שהחיסון הזה לא תוכנן למנוע הדבקה https://t.co/zBsXStBqWA ובמבחן התוצאה גם לא מנע אותה,לא בניסוי הקליני שצירפתי לעיל וגם לא במחקרים שנעשו בדיעבד https://t.co/rBe1KrZjTW כך שלא ברור איזו "פגיעה באחרים"
@greg_travis @amagnono @SodaO @MLevitt_NP2013 Fair, but we weren’t going to get it with this vaccine either, and some people anticipated this too. https://t.co/ktBt1IH91A
@goddeketal This was known early on before the vaccines were released, for example. "The upper respiratory tract is thought to be mainly protected by secretory IgA, whereas the lower respiratory tract is thought to be mainly protected by IgG. Vaccines that
@KalksteinNir @y1shaul 1.לא. החוקרים ידעו שהניסוי לא מספק מידע על הדבקה אסימפטומטית. זה בdiscussion. אם אין מידע על הדבקה אסימפטומטית,אין מידע על transmission https://t.co/znzPnlJIiw 2.גם לפני כן ידעו שחיסונים שאינם בתרסיס בעייתיים במניעת הדבקה של URTI.כל
@FESmith1872 @gorskon @moderna_tx @BeckyQuick No, he did not said anything about mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. If you think otherwise, you should provide a source for that. I don't believe anything, this literally happened. You're over 2.5 years behind. They d
@gerdosi @DrJBhattacharya @FatEmperor sep 2020 https://t.co/5U4gUm3ONj Janeway immunology 9th : 2017 https://t.co/CLPfosDKDD
Good point. The scientific literature has always called it SARS. https://t.co/jDaj7QTlve
@BlNinsider @rosenfeldpj @FeliciaBinger Es war auch klar, dass es im Grunde keine sterile Immunität geben kann, "Solidarität" und "2G" waren eine ... siehe Bild im Tweet https://t.co/3VIOpvZwU0
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Veröffentlicht im September 2020 in „Nature“: https://t.co/tnxD7SxmG3 https://t.co/xF7BcHtMWj
6/ Veröffentlicht im September 2020 in „Nature“: https://t.co/tnxD7SxmG3 https://t.co/xF7BcHtMWj
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: @gerdosi @holmenkollin Mr. Florian #Krammer wrote that again in September 2020, via „nature“: So why were we told we co…
@gerdosi @holmenkollin Mr. Florian #Krammer wrote that again in September 2020, via „nature“: So why were we told we could achieve herd immunity with the current covid-vaccines? #WirWollenAntworten #WeWantAnswers https://t.co/tnxD7SxmG3 https://t.co/APx
@DavidMc19827936 @Sinfulskin2 SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines being clinically developed for years. Here’s a good article on the development of what we call the COVID vaccine. https://t.co/9TQTscNsT4
How much more context is provided in 2005 than 2020 if you put these articles side by side https://t.co/1ENzfVktjj 2005 SARS-Cov-2 early 2020 https://t.co/cKopLeKB7C
@nikanor1983 @yariv_hammer @kann_news @Nov_reuveny 2. בשולי הדברים, גם הקונספציה לא ממש תמכה ביעילות חיסוני פייזר במניעת הדבקה. כבר ב2020 הופיעו פרסומים הנוגעים לחוסר יעילותם של חיסונים הניתנים בזריקה תוך שרירית (בניגוד לחיסוני תרסיס או להידבקות-עבר)במניעת
@roby_bhatt Ok. I'll play. I love the opportunity to reflect on some tweets that were really impactful/influential for me. The first that comes to mind is @florian_krammer's epic 138 tweet long thread on COVID vaccines: https://t.co/bHJ91iX0ty
@zoeharcombe This 23 September 2020 paper in Nature describes the overlapping development phase method; months before any vaccines were authorised. "SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development" https://t.co/bchL6MsqKL The method is the same as my earlier images.
@SamVanloocke @TijlDeBie @M_B_Petersen @ZorgVlaanderen @crevits @wbeke Dat is nooit haalbaar geweest vanwege de wijze van toediening en dat wisten ze maar al te goed. Intramusculaire vaccinatie verschaft geen robuuste immuunrespons op het niveau van neus,
@jjgiablue @sububoston @mRNAdisrupts @US_FDA https://t.co/zONkDSzzax Go to “Overview of NHP results” 🤷🏻♂️
@delanghe_ryan @LiminalWave @Rich_Buschel @RogerZenAF @TomiLahren This from September 2020 includes simple chart and explanation of shorter timeframe developers were working with https://t.co/Gya4LwObs2
RT @medmarros: Szanowni Państwo, był sobie kiedyś łysenkizm. Oto jego reedycja. Zremasterowany, cyfrowo poprawiony, w ekskluzywnym opakowan…
@Thomidog1 @LM_Ginger_Kitty @AnotherPick @Marckovvvvv2 Curious then that a virus outside China was isolated just a few weeks after & yet big pharma still chose to use the CCP DNA data for SARSCoV2 as a basis to develop their non vaccines? Why would the
RT @medmarros: Szanowni Państwo, był sobie kiedyś łysenkizm. Oto jego reedycja. Zremasterowany, cyfrowo poprawiony, w ekskluzywnym opakowan…
RT @medmarros: Szanowni Państwo, był sobie kiedyś łysenkizm. Oto jego reedycja. Zremasterowany, cyfrowo poprawiony, w ekskluzywnym opakowan…
Ancient (two year old) mega thread on the v@xxes. A good reminder of some of the details of each one.
@chuisti @Deunan38 @Farhandecide Lo dicho antes. https://t.co/YxKdGKHIBe
@Farhandecide @Deunan38 Desde antes de que salieran los primeros resultados del primer ensayo clínico en fase 3. De nada. https://t.co/TXjKifmEG0
@katjabraendle @rosenbusch_ @SKhaksari Die meisten reden sich noch immer ein, dass es stimmt. Nur die Mutation, für die ja die Un... verantwortlich sind, habe den Fremdschutz aufgehoben. Das es bei respiratorischen Viren nicht funktioniereren kann, egal. h
@TopGyalKeiko So, while poorly written, it is true many researchers suspected a vax delivered by muscular injection wouldn’t provide any protection in the upper respiratory system because of restricted blood flow. Brix also said she knew it wouldn’t help.
RT @JoseMJG: Aquí podemos encontrar más información sobre el desarrollo de vacunas frente al nuevo coronavirus 👇 https://t.co/mmoNO4XxNB
@john_mcguirk @RuairiTraderIRL For anyone still interested, @florian_krammer very long but excellent vax Tweetorial touched on this area. It was expected. https://t.co/qGq17IgtBK
RT @florian_krammer: 1) SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines - I promised a Tweetorial and here we go. This is going to be long and nerdy. But I'll make sur…
@bookie808 @martamarco__ Because the vaccines aren’t force shields , they just provide functional immunity. And this has been explained since 2020. https://t.co/TXjKif5BE0
@Elle373 @StephTaitWrites The vaccines were based on years of research to develop a SARS/MERS vaccine. Not rushed “Because of knowledge gained from the initial development of vaccines for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, the discovery phase was omitted.” https://t
@Bigthana78 @Kohlrabi82 @PSHolstein @zeitonline Da können Sie es nachlesen. https://t.co/LTr8359Eei
@Mara15920409 @nickplatino1 @ChakNorris93 @todomejorqenada @SRveterinaria @jorari71 @TrenaValerio @Ana53361233 @JoseMJG Como vendieron? No, desde el principio los científicos dedicados a este tema dijeron que no evitaba el contagio, que es de inmunidad fun
@otraraiz @ChakNorris93 @todomejorqenada @SRveterinaria @jorari71 @TrenaValerio @Ana53361233 @JoseMJG Porque no entiendes el mecanismo o de la vacuna y porqué tiene inmunidad funcional. Es lo que tiene pensarse que una vacuna es un campo de fuerza. Figura
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: @Radbruch_lab @florian_krammer Ich bin ein wenig ratlos, Herr Krammer. Hatten Sie nicht genau das bereits vor zwei Jahre…
@Radbruch_lab @florian_krammer Ich bin ein wenig ratlos, Herr Krammer. Hatten Sie nicht genau das bereits vor zwei Jahren ähnlich geäußert, in folgender Publikation in Nature Vol. 586? Zum Thema RNA-vaccines: „In addition, these vaccines are administered
@FischerSkype @Bangeline6 @AnnieS93099341 @veit_markus @PSHolstein Übrigens: Davon, dass die intramuskulären Impfstoffe Infektionen per se nicht verhindern werden, konnte man vor der Markeinführung vermuten (Fig 2): https://t.co/LTr83596oK Dass sie es doc
RT @lfoquet: Het is belangrijk om een figuur juist te quoten wanneer je die overneemt uit een publicatie. Je eigen interpretatie toevoegen…
Bijlage 1: draad over #cherrypicking mbt mucosale response van @lfoquet.
@RampartRabbit @LordOfTheYiffs @DiezelRaccoon https://t.co/Ci4uahNbxz After the 2002–2004 SARS outbreak vaccines against SARS-CoV were developed preclinically and two were tested in phase I trials 5 6. However development was stopped because the virus was
@SchoofsLiliane @HarrySnel1 @markvanasten @bas_erades @MaartenRooijak2 @Stunderen @JonaWalk Tsja dit wordt welles nietes. Ik laat u en uw volgers graag achter met deze geniale draad die wel goed ingaat op mogelijkheden (combi) vaccinatie dus zowel gericht
@JohnrockRosa @OlPhilCollins @Kirky861 @rupasubramanya @bariweiss You don’t understand intramuscular vaccines don’t provide mucosal immunity do you? In other words, it doesn’t slow spread at all. https://t.co/ktBt1IH91A
@chindogu_io @M_T_Franz Sie sollten sich wenigstens die Mühe geben, die unterschiedlichen Impfungen und deren Wirkungsweise zu unterschieden. https://t.co/kdurQHJj8K
@claire75557038 @UnicoMagnifico @BrunoROCCA16 @franceinfo Et ils ont obtenu une AMM = Plus en phase expérimentale😉 Les études cliniques (stade expérimental de la phase 3) se sont terminées en nov 2020. 45000 volontaires y ont participé. https://t.co/SwCO5
The ones without data always block. It is well known that an intramuscular vaccine will not translate into robust mucosal immunity. https://t.co/ktBt1IH91A https://t.co/yVLgqvIYnV
RT @orntwo: @DrEricDing @AliNouriPhD Yes, this was well known, as it was well known the intramuscular vax would not slow the spread, instea…
@DrEricDing @AliNouriPhD Yes, this was well known, as it was well known the intramuscular vax would not slow the spread, instead public health advocates lied. https://t.co/ktBt1IH91A
@Elitiker @MaikAdler @argonerd Hätten wir? Ich hatte das Ende 2020 wegen https://t.co/tqdLnetg1v aufgegeben.
RT @ENirenberg: Type I mucosa mainly relies on IgA as the protective antibody. While IgG dominates in the blood, the antibody isotype most…
RT @ENirenberg: Type I mucosa mainly relies on IgA as the protective antibody. While IgG dominates in the blood, the antibody isotype most…
@19Insomnia82 @LeMau1988 @Radieschen2 @liberalkk @OlafGersemann @welt Sagte ja auch "entfernt", also nicht im Einsatz. Schleimhautimmunität ist nach Impfung nur von kurzer Dauer, zudem sehr individuell. Ist bei allen respiratorischen Viren so https://t.co/
RT @ENirenberg: Type I mucosa mainly relies on IgA as the protective antibody. While IgG dominates in the blood, the antibody isotype most…
RT @ENirenberg: Type I mucosa mainly relies on IgA as the protective antibody. While IgG dominates in the blood, the antibody isotype most…