Two-Year Experience in “Tweeting the Meeting” During the Scientific Sessions ― Rapid Report From the Japanese Circulation Society ―
Circulation Reports, November 2020
Atsushi Mizuno, Takuya Kishi, Chisa Matsumoto, Mari Ishida, Shoji Sanada, Memori Fukuda, Yuki Sahashi, Tadafumi Sugimoto, Miki Hirano, Yusuke Yoshikawa, Erika Yamamoto, Takeshi Kimura, Koichi Node
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||132||92%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||7||5%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||<1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||50%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||17%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||33%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||17%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Reports
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 422,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Reports
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.